Evie Litherland-Smith
b60396f38c
Make comment / doc face a bit more legible
Change outline-{1,8} faces to be traversing rainbow themed
Update font-showcase with up to 10 levels of Header (to show wrapping)
and a table with an ASCII plot
111 lines
4.2 KiB
Org Mode
111 lines
4.2 KiB
Org Mode
#+title: Font Showcase
|
||
#+author: Evie Litherland-Smith
|
||
#+email: evie@xenia.me.uk
|
||
#+language: en
|
||
This is a showcase of various font features to act as a standard
|
||
candle.
|
||
* Header 1
|
||
** Header 2
|
||
*** Header 3
|
||
**** Header 4
|
||
***** Header 5
|
||
****** Header 6
|
||
******* Header 7
|
||
******** Header 8
|
||
********* Header 9
|
||
********** Header 10
|
||
* Font emphasis
|
||
Examples of:
|
||
- *Bold text*
|
||
- /Italic text/
|
||
- _Underscored text_
|
||
- =Literal text=
|
||
- ~Code~
|
||
- +Strike-through+
|
||
* Character showcase
|
||
#+begin_example
|
||
ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
|
||
!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
|
||
1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
|
||
E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
|
||
#+end_example
|
||
** Legibility test
|
||
Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
|
||
How about: 0,O,o
|
||
* Tables
|
||
| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot |
|
||
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
|
||
| 1 | 1 | |
|
||
| 2 | 4 | c |
|
||
| 3 | 9 | W |
|
||
| 4 | 16 | WV |
|
||
| 5 | 25 | WWH |
|
||
| 6 | 36 | WWWW: |
|
||
| 7 | 49 | WWWWWV |
|
||
| 8 | 64 | WWWWWWWl |
|
||
| 9 | 81 | WWWWWWWWWh |
|
||
| 10 | 100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
|
||
#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
|
||
* Coding ligatures
|
||
#+begin_example
|
||
-<< -< -<- <-- <--- <<- <- -> ->> --> ---> ->- >- >>-
|
||
|
||
=<< =< =<= <== <=== <<= <= => =>> ==> ===> =>= >= >>=
|
||
|
||
<-> <--> <---> <----> <=> <==> <===> <====> :: ::: __
|
||
|
||
<~~ </ </> /> ~~> == != /= ~= <> === !== !=== =/= =!=
|
||
|
||
<: := *= *+ <* <*> *> <| <|> |> <. <.> .> +* =* =: :>
|
||
|
||
(* *) /* */ [| |] {| |} ++ +++ \/ /\ |- -| <!-- <!---
|
||
#+end_example
|
||
* Source blocks
|
||
#+begin_src python
|
||
def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
|
||
"""
|
||
Example docstring for function
|
||
"""
|
||
return
|
||
|
||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||
main()
|
||
#+end_src
|
||
* Example prose
|
||
#+begin_quote
|
||
AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
|
||
linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
|
||
principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
|
||
prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
|
||
those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
|
||
period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
|
||
human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
|
||
essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
|
||
living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
|
||
much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
|
||
different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
|
||
and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
|
||
Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
|
||
between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
|
||
to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
|
||
languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
|
||
wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
|
||
natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
|
||
female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
|
||
geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
|
||
haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
|
||
but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
|
||
|
||
This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
|
||
languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
|
||
time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
|
||
subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
|
||
received from the philological research of our century. The various
|
||
efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
|
||
essential difference which exists between the theories of language
|
||
development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
|
||
which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
|
||
comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
|
||
philological and historical research that border on it.
|
||
#+end_quote
|