Move font showcase into README.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
9bc9579450
commit
d949bd1c92
107
README.org
107
README.org
|
|
@ -1533,3 +1533,110 @@ Configure email with iCalendar event support, to integrate with
|
||||||
(keymap-global-set "C-c w d" #'my/open-documents-directory)
|
(keymap-global-set "C-c w d" #'my/open-documents-directory)
|
||||||
(keymap-global-set "C-c w C-d" #'my/open-downloads-directory)
|
(keymap-global-set "C-c w C-d" #'my/open-downloads-directory)
|
||||||
#+end_src
|
#+end_src
|
||||||
|
* Font Showcase
|
||||||
|
This is a showcase of various font features to act as a standard
|
||||||
|
candle.
|
||||||
|
** Header 2
|
||||||
|
*** Header 3
|
||||||
|
**** Header 4
|
||||||
|
***** Header 5
|
||||||
|
****** Header 6
|
||||||
|
******* Header 7
|
||||||
|
******** Header 8
|
||||||
|
********* Header 9
|
||||||
|
********** Header 10
|
||||||
|
** Font emphasis
|
||||||
|
Examples of:
|
||||||
|
- *Bold text*
|
||||||
|
- /Italic text/
|
||||||
|
- _Underscored text_
|
||||||
|
- =Literal text=
|
||||||
|
- ~Code~
|
||||||
|
- +Strike-through+
|
||||||
|
** Character showcase
|
||||||
|
#+begin_example
|
||||||
|
ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
|
||||||
|
!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
|
||||||
|
1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
|
||||||
|
E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
|
||||||
|
#+end_example
|
||||||
|
*** Legibility test
|
||||||
|
Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
|
||||||
|
How about: 0,O,o
|
||||||
|
** Tables
|
||||||
|
| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot |
|
||||||
|
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
|
||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | 4 | c |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | 9 | W |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | 16 | WV |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | 25 | WWH |
|
||||||
|
| 6 | 36 | WWWW: |
|
||||||
|
| 7 | 49 | WWWWWV |
|
||||||
|
| 8 | 64 | WWWWWWWl |
|
||||||
|
| 9 | 81 | WWWWWWWWWh |
|
||||||
|
| 10 | 100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
|
||||||
|
#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
|
||||||
|
** Coding ligatures
|
||||||
|
#+begin_example
|
||||||
|
-<< -< -<- <-- <--- <<- <- -> ->> --> ---> ->- >- >>-
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
=<< =< =<= <== <=== <<= <= => =>> ==> ===> =>= >= >>=
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<-> <--> <---> <----> <=> <==> <===> <====> :: ::: __
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<~~ </ </> /> ~~> == != /= ~= <> === !== !=== =/= =!=
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<: := *= *+ <* <*> *> <| <|> |> <. <.> .> +* =* =: :>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(* *) /* */ [| |] {| |} ++ +++ \/ /\ |- -| <!-- <!---
|
||||||
|
#+end_example
|
||||||
|
** Source blocks
|
||||||
|
#+begin_src python
|
||||||
|
def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Example docstring for function
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
return
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||||
|
main()
|
||||||
|
#+end_src
|
||||||
|
** Example prose
|
||||||
|
#+begin_quote
|
||||||
|
AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
|
||||||
|
linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
|
||||||
|
principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
|
||||||
|
prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
|
||||||
|
those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
|
||||||
|
period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
|
||||||
|
human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
|
||||||
|
essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
|
||||||
|
living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
|
||||||
|
much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
|
||||||
|
different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
|
||||||
|
and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
|
||||||
|
Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
|
||||||
|
between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
|
||||||
|
to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
|
||||||
|
languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
|
||||||
|
wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
|
||||||
|
natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
|
||||||
|
female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
|
||||||
|
geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
|
||||||
|
haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
|
||||||
|
but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
|
||||||
|
languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
|
||||||
|
time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
|
||||||
|
subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
|
||||||
|
received from the philological research of our century. The various
|
||||||
|
efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
|
||||||
|
essential difference which exists between the theories of language
|
||||||
|
development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
|
||||||
|
which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
|
||||||
|
comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
|
||||||
|
philological and historical research that border on it.
|
||||||
|
#+end_quote
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
#+title: Font Showcase
|
|
||||||
#+author: Evie Litherland-Smith
|
|
||||||
#+email: evie@xenia.me.uk
|
|
||||||
#+language: en
|
|
||||||
This is a showcase of various font features to act as a standard
|
|
||||||
candle.
|
|
||||||
* Header 1
|
|
||||||
** Header 2
|
|
||||||
*** Header 3
|
|
||||||
**** Header 4
|
|
||||||
***** Header 5
|
|
||||||
****** Header 6
|
|
||||||
******* Header 7
|
|
||||||
******** Header 8
|
|
||||||
********* Header 9
|
|
||||||
********** Header 10
|
|
||||||
* Font emphasis
|
|
||||||
Examples of:
|
|
||||||
- *Bold text*
|
|
||||||
- /Italic text/
|
|
||||||
- _Underscored text_
|
|
||||||
- =Literal text=
|
|
||||||
- ~Code~
|
|
||||||
- +Strike-through+
|
|
||||||
* Character showcase
|
|
||||||
#+begin_example
|
|
||||||
ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
|
|
||||||
!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
|
|
||||||
1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
|
|
||||||
E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
|
|
||||||
#+end_example
|
|
||||||
** Legibility test
|
|
||||||
Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
|
|
||||||
How about: 0,O,o
|
|
||||||
* Tables
|
|
||||||
| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot |
|
|
||||||
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
|
|
||||||
| 1 | 1 | |
|
|
||||||
| 2 | 4 | c |
|
|
||||||
| 3 | 9 | W |
|
|
||||||
| 4 | 16 | WV |
|
|
||||||
| 5 | 25 | WWH |
|
|
||||||
| 6 | 36 | WWWW: |
|
|
||||||
| 7 | 49 | WWWWWV |
|
|
||||||
| 8 | 64 | WWWWWWWl |
|
|
||||||
| 9 | 81 | WWWWWWWWWh |
|
|
||||||
| 10 | 100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
|
|
||||||
#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
|
|
||||||
* Coding ligatures
|
|
||||||
#+begin_example
|
|
||||||
-<< -< -<- <-- <--- <<- <- -> ->> --> ---> ->- >- >>-
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=<< =< =<= <== <=== <<= <= => =>> ==> ===> =>= >= >>=
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<-> <--> <---> <----> <=> <==> <===> <====> :: ::: __
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<~~ </ </> /> ~~> == != /= ~= <> === !== !=== =/= =!=
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<: := *= *+ <* <*> *> <| <|> |> <. <.> .> +* =* =: :>
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(* *) /* */ [| |] {| |} ++ +++ \/ /\ |- -| <!-- <!---
|
|
||||||
#+end_example
|
|
||||||
* Source blocks
|
|
||||||
#+begin_src python
|
|
||||||
def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
Example docstring for function
|
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
return
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
||||||
main()
|
|
||||||
#+end_src
|
|
||||||
* Example prose
|
|
||||||
#+begin_quote
|
|
||||||
AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
|
|
||||||
linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
|
|
||||||
principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
|
|
||||||
prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
|
|
||||||
those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
|
|
||||||
period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
|
|
||||||
human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
|
|
||||||
essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
|
|
||||||
living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
|
|
||||||
much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
|
|
||||||
different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
|
|
||||||
and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
|
|
||||||
Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
|
|
||||||
between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
|
|
||||||
to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
|
|
||||||
languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
|
|
||||||
wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
|
|
||||||
natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
|
|
||||||
female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
|
|
||||||
geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
|
|
||||||
haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
|
|
||||||
but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
|
|
||||||
languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
|
|
||||||
time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
|
|
||||||
subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
|
|
||||||
received from the philological research of our century. The various
|
|
||||||
efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
|
|
||||||
essential difference which exists between the theories of language
|
|
||||||
development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
|
|
||||||
which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
|
|
||||||
comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
|
|
||||||
philological and historical research that border on it.
|
|
||||||
#+end_quote
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue