diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index 6101a70..0046d21 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -1533,3 +1533,110 @@ Configure email with iCalendar event support, to integrate with
   (keymap-global-set "C-c w d" #'my/open-documents-directory)
   (keymap-global-set "C-c w C-d" #'my/open-downloads-directory)
 #+end_src
+* Font Showcase
+This is a showcase of various font features to act as a standard
+candle.
+** Header 2
+*** Header 3
+**** Header 4
+***** Header 5
+****** Header 6
+******* Header 7
+******** Header 8
+********* Header 9
+********** Header 10
+** Font emphasis
+Examples of:
+- *Bold text*
+- /Italic text/
+- _Underscored text_
+- =Literal text=
+- ~Code~
+- +Strike-through+
+** Character showcase
+#+begin_example
+ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
+!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
+1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
+E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
+#+end_example
+*** Legibility test
+Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
+How about: 0,O,o
+** Tables
+| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot         |
+|-----------+-----------+--------------|
+|         1 |         1 |              |
+|         2 |         4 | c            |
+|         3 |         9 | W            |
+|         4 |        16 | WV           |
+|         5 |        25 | WWH          |
+|         6 |        36 | WWWW:        |
+|         7 |        49 | WWWWWV       |
+|         8 |        64 | WWWWWWWl     |
+|         9 |        81 | WWWWWWWWWh   |
+|        10 |       100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
+#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
+** Coding ligatures
+#+begin_example
+-<< -< -<- <-- <--- <<- <- -> ->> --> ---> ->- >- >>-
+
+=<< =< =<= <== <=== <<= <= => =>> ==> ===> =>= >= >>=
+
+<-> <--> <---> <----> <=> <==> <===> <====> :: ::: __
+
+<~~ </ </> /> ~~> == != /= ~= <> === !== !=== =/= =!=
+
+<: := *= *+ <* <*> *> <| <|> |> <. <.> .> +* =* =: :>
+
+(* *) /* */ [| |] {| |} ++ +++ \/ /\ |- -| <!-- <!---
+#+end_example
+** Source blocks
+#+begin_src python
+  def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
+      """
+      Example docstring for function
+      """
+      return
+
+  if __name__ == "__main__":
+      main()
+#+end_src
+** Example prose
+#+begin_quote
+AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
+linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
+principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
+prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
+those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
+period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
+human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
+essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
+living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
+much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
+different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
+and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
+Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
+between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
+to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
+languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
+wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
+natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
+female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
+geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
+haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
+but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
+
+This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
+languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
+time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
+subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
+received from the philological research of our century. The various
+efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
+essential difference which exists between the theories of language
+development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
+which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
+comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
+philological and historical research that border on it.
+#+end_quote
+
diff --git a/font-showcase.org b/font-showcase.org
deleted file mode 100644
index 4253e65..0000000
--- a/font-showcase.org
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
-#+title: Font Showcase
-#+author: Evie Litherland-Smith
-#+email: evie@xenia.me.uk
-#+language: en
-This is a showcase of various font features to act as a standard
-candle.
-* Header 1
-** Header 2
-*** Header 3
-**** Header 4
-***** Header 5
-****** Header 6
-******* Header 7
-******** Header 8
-********* Header 9
-********** Header 10
-* Font emphasis
-Examples of:
-- *Bold text*
-- /Italic text/
-- _Underscored text_
-- =Literal text=
-- ~Code~
-- +Strike-through+
-* Character showcase
-#+begin_example
-ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
-!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
-1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
-E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
-#+end_example
-** Legibility test
-Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
-How about: 0,O,o
-* Tables
-| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot         |
-|-----------+-----------+--------------|
-|         1 |         1 |              |
-|         2 |         4 | c            |
-|         3 |         9 | W            |
-|         4 |        16 | WV           |
-|         5 |        25 | WWH          |
-|         6 |        36 | WWWW:        |
-|         7 |        49 | WWWWWV       |
-|         8 |        64 | WWWWWWWl     |
-|         9 |        81 | WWWWWWWWWh   |
-|        10 |       100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
-#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
-* Coding ligatures
-#+begin_example
--<< -< -<- <-- <--- <<- <- -> ->> --> ---> ->- >- >>-
-
-=<< =< =<= <== <=== <<= <= => =>> ==> ===> =>= >= >>=
-
-<-> <--> <---> <----> <=> <==> <===> <====> :: ::: __
-
-<~~ </ </> /> ~~> == != /= ~= <> === !== !=== =/= =!=
-
-<: := *= *+ <* <*> *> <| <|> |> <. <.> .> +* =* =: :>
-
-(* *) /* */ [| |] {| |} ++ +++ \/ /\ |- -| <!-- <!---
-#+end_example
-* Source blocks
-#+begin_src python
-  def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
-      """
-      Example docstring for function
-      """
-      return
-
-  if __name__ == "__main__":
-      main()
-#+end_src
-* Example prose
-#+begin_quote
-AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
-linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
-principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
-prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
-those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
-period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
-human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
-essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
-living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
-much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
-different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
-and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
-Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
-between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
-to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
-languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
-wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
-natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
-female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
-geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
-haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
-but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
-
-This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
-languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
-time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
-subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
-received from the philological research of our century. The various
-efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
-essential difference which exists between the theories of language
-development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
-which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
-comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
-philological and historical research that border on it.
-#+end_quote