85 lines
3.6 KiB
Org Mode
85 lines
3.6 KiB
Org Mode
|
#+TITLE: Font Showcase
|
|||
|
|
#+AUTHOR: Evie Litherland-Smith
|
|||
|
|
This is a showcase of various font and UI features to act as a
|
|||
|
|
standard candle.
|
|||
|
|
* Font emphasis
|
|||
|
|
Examples of:
|
|||
|
|
- *Bold text*
|
|||
|
|
- /Italic text/
|
|||
|
|
- _Underscored text_
|
|||
|
|
- =Literal text=
|
|||
|
|
- ~Code~
|
|||
|
|
- +Strike-through+
|
|||
|
|
* Character showcase
|
|||
|
|
#+begin_example
|
|||
|
|
ABC.DEF.GHI.JKL.MNO.PQRS.TUV.WXYZ abc.def.ghi.jkl.mno.pqrs.tuv.wxyz
|
|||
|
|
!iIlL17|¦ ¢coO08BbDQ $5SZ2zs 96µm float il1[]={1-2/3.4,5+6=7/8%90};
|
|||
|
|
1234567890 ,._-+= >< «¯-¬_» ~–÷+× {*}[]()<>`+-=$/#_%^@\&|~?'" !,.;:
|
|||
|
|
E3CGQ g9q¶ uvw ſßðþ ΓΔΛαδιλμξπτχ∂ ЖЗКУЯжзклмнруфчьыя <= != == => ->
|
|||
|
|
#+end_example
|
|||
|
|
** Legibility test
|
|||
|
|
Can I tell the difference between: 1,i,I,l,L,|
|
|||
|
|
How about: 0,O,o
|
|||
|
|
* Tables
|
|||
|
|
| Heading 1 | Heading 2 | Plot |
|
|||
|
|
|-----------+-----------+--------------|
|
|||
|
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
|||
|
|
| 2 | 4 | c |
|
|||
|
|
| 3 | 9 | W |
|
|||
|
|
| 4 | 16 | WV |
|
|||
|
|
| 5 | 25 | WWH |
|
|||
|
|
| 6 | 36 | WWWW: |
|
|||
|
|
| 7 | 49 | WWWWWV |
|
|||
|
|
| 8 | 64 | WWWWWWWl |
|
|||
|
|
| 9 | 81 | WWWWWWWWWh |
|
|||
|
|
| 10 | 100 | WWWWWWWWWWWW |
|
|||
|
|
#+TBLFM: $2=$1**2::$3='(orgtbl-ascii-draw $2 1 100 12)
|
|||
|
|
* Source blocks
|
|||
|
|
#+begin_src python
|
|||
|
|
def main(*args, **kwargs) -> None:
|
|||
|
|
"""
|
|||
|
|
Example docstring for function
|
|||
|
|
"""
|
|||
|
|
return
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|||
|
|
main()
|
|||
|
|
#+end_src
|
|||
|
|
* Example prose
|
|||
|
|
#+begin_quote
|
|||
|
|
AMONG the many valuable contributions of William Dwight Whitney to
|
|||
|
|
linguistic science is one especially important and fundamental
|
|||
|
|
principle. It may be stated in these words. In explaining the
|
|||
|
|
prehistoric phenomena of language we must assume no other factors than
|
|||
|
|
those which we are able to observe and estimate in the historical
|
|||
|
|
period of language development. The factors that produced changes in
|
|||
|
|
human speech five thousand or ten thousand years ago cannot have been
|
|||
|
|
essentially different from those which are now operating to transform
|
|||
|
|
living languages. On the basis of this principle we look to-day at a
|
|||
|
|
much-discussed problem of Indo-European philology with views very
|
|||
|
|
different from the views held by the founders of Comparative Philology
|
|||
|
|
and their immediate successors. I refer to the problem, how the
|
|||
|
|
Indo-European people came to assign gender to nouns, to distinguish
|
|||
|
|
between masculine, feminine, and neuter. This question is of interest
|
|||
|
|
to others besides philologists. What man of culture who has learned
|
|||
|
|
languages such as the Greek, Latin, or French has not at times
|
|||
|
|
wondered that objects which have no possible connection with the
|
|||
|
|
natural gender of animals appear constantly in the language as male or
|
|||
|
|
female? In German, for example, it is der fuss, but die hand; der
|
|||
|
|
geist, but die seele; in Latin, hīc hortus, hīc animus, hīc amor, but
|
|||
|
|
haec planta, haec anima, haec felicitas; in Greek, ὁ πλοῦτος, ὁ οἶκος,
|
|||
|
|
but ἡ πενία, ἡ οἰκία.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This gender distinction pervades all the older Indo-European
|
|||
|
|
languages, and must therefore be regarded as having its origin in the
|
|||
|
|
time of the pro-ethnic Indo-European community. Not only is the
|
|||
|
|
subject itself full of interest, but also the treatment it has
|
|||
|
|
received from the philological research of our century. The various
|
|||
|
|
efforts made to solve the problem may very aptly illustrate an
|
|||
|
|
essential difference which exists between the theories of language
|
|||
|
|
development held in the beginning and middle of this century and those
|
|||
|
|
which prevail to-day, — a difference of method existing not in
|
|||
|
|
comparative linguistics alone, but also in other fields of
|
|||
|
|
philological and historical research that border on it.
|
|||
|
|
#+end_quote
|